Battle Lines Drawn Over Broadcast Treaty Drew Wilson | September 20, 2006 As reported earlier, WIPO is currently considering a broadcasting and webcasting treaty that would give rights to those disseminating intellectual property for 50 years. Note: This is an article I wrote that was published elsewhere first. It has been republished here for archival purposes The treaty has caused a lot of discontent and a number of US based companies and organizations are stepping forward to express their opposition. The EFF posted an unofficial transcript of a couple of meetings that discussed, among other things, the webcasting treaty. When the webcasting treaty was first proposed, it was almost unanimously rejected and was effectively tossed out. This didn’t kill the webcasting treaty as it came back in to other provisions set forth by WIPO. This caused a stir and discontent as one can see in the meeting’s unofficial transcript. The unofficial transcript eventually shows that the matter of webcasting was seemingly deferred to a later time. Now that news travelled around on what WIPO was up to, a number of US based companies have passed along a letter opposing the broadcasting treaty: “If the treaty moves forward in any form, we believe that the current rights-based approach of the treaty must be abandoned. Creating broad new intellectual property rights in order to protect broadcast signals is misguided and unnecessary, and risks serious unintended negative consequences.” What may be of interest to many is the complete list of those signing this letter. The list of companies and organizations signing this letter are the following: American Association of Law Libraries American Library Association Association of Research Libraries AT&T Broadband Service Providers Association Center for Democracy & Technology Cingular Wireless Computer and Communications Industry Association Consumer Electronics Association Consumer Project on Technology CTIA – The Wireless Association Dell Inc. Electronic Frontier Foundation FreePress Hewlett Packard Company Home Recording Rights Coalition Intel Corporation International Music Managers Forum Internet Society IP Justice Media Access Project Medical Library Association National Association of State PIRGs Panasonic Corporation of North America Public Knowledge RadioShack Corporation Special Libraries Association Sony Electronics Incorporated TiVo Inc. Union for the Public Domain U.S. Internet Industry Association U.S. Music Managers Forum U.S. Public Interest Research Group USTelecom Verizon Communications Inc. Verizon Wireless Yale Information Society Project Considering the broadcast treaty was even rejected by the US representative, the issues surrounding this treaty seem to go deeper than a judicial showdown. Drew Wilson on Twitter: @icecube85 and Google+. Share this:Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)MoreClick to print (Opens in new window)Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)Like this:Like Loading...